A significant majority of companies initially considered for a pilot program allowing tokenized stocks on a blockchain trading venue have formally objected to a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) innovation exemption order. According to Primal Capital partner Sebastien Davies, 84% of the initial 62 candidate companies for OKXICE submitted objections before the November 3rd deadline.
The SEC’s innovation exemption order, issued on September 17th, was designed to allow tokenized securities trading venues (TSVs) to operate for five years without registering as traditional exchanges. This framework requires that tokens correspond to real assets and that token holders possess equivalent rights to traditional shareholders, including dividend and voting rights. The exemption utilizes a ‘presumed consent’ mechanism, which allows TSVs to operate unless issuers actively object within a 30-day waiting period.
The ‘Presumed Consent’ Dilemma
Companies have raised concerns that this ‘presumed consent’ is a passive right of objection rather than proactive consent. This has coincided with widespread opposition, with major corporations such as Apple, Nvidia, Amazon, and Tesla submitting objections in late October and early November. Applied Optoelectronics (AOI) stated that they saw no clear benefit to offset the uncertainties associated with the order. Similarly, Nasdaq’s guidance suggested that such trading venues could “in essence create a shadow dark pool market for equity securities,” raising concerns about market transparency and fairness.
Industry Groups and Market Concerns
Industry groups have also voiced strong opposition. SIFMA requested the SEC reverse the ‘presumed consent’ rule, and Goldman Sachs, a core SIFMA member, was among the first to object. Fairmint highlighted that tokenization adds a new ledger layer on top of existing custodial systems like the DTC, potentially increasing reconciliation difficulties. Companies are objecting, in part, because the cost of objection is minimal—a written letter—while the potential risks and uncertainties are significant.
This opposition is seen by some as a defense of traditional financial giants and their control over regulatory rule-making. The scale of off-shore tokenized stock trading, such as the $25.6 billion in volume reported on BNB Chain in the third quarter, operates largely outside SEC regulation, highlighting a divergence in market approaches.
Strategic Investments Amidst Objections
Despite the objections to the current exemption, major financial players continue to invest in tokenization capabilities. Nasdaq has formed a digital assets division and invested in Kraken’s parent company, indicating strategic ambitions in the space. Additionally, Canton Strategic Holdings announced a partnership for an ‘issuer-initiated’ tokenization model, suggesting a potential future direction for the market.
The situation remains uncertain, with questions about the ultimate fate of the SEC’s exemption order and how companies will engage with future tokenization models. The divergence in corporate reactions and the active resistance to the current regulatory path suggest that the design and control of trading mechanisms will be critical factors in the future development of tokenized securities.
Why This Matters
The materials describe a narrow update: A significant majority (84%) of companies initially considered for a pilot program allowing tokenized stocks on a blockchain trading venue (OKXICE) have formally objected to the SEC’s innovation exemption order. The ultimate fate of the SEC’s innovation exemption order.
Broader Context
Source materials place the factual news in this context: The SEC’s innovation exemption order aimed to allow tokenized stocks to be tested on-chain for five years.
Leave a Reply