UpGate

Category: Uncategorized

  • Bitwise NEAR ETF Clears Regulatory Hurdles, Launch Nears

    Bitwise NEAR ETF Clears Regulatory Hurdles, Launch Nears

    Bitwise Secures Key Approvals for NEAR Protocol ETF, Eyes Late September Launch

    Bitwise Investment Advisers has successfully navigated two significant regulatory milestones for its proposed spot NEAR Protocol Exchange Traded Fund (ETF), paving the way for a potential launch around September 29, 2026. On September 24, 2026, NYSE Arca approved the ETF’s listing application, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) confirmed the effectiveness of the trust’s registration statement via Form 8-A on the same day.

    The ETF, slated to trade under the ticker symbol NRR, is structured to hold NEAR Protocol tokens directly. A key feature of the fund is its intention to stake the entirety of its holdings, aiming to generate additional yield from staking rewards on top of any potential price appreciation of the underlying asset. This approach distinguishes it from Bitcoin or Ether ETFs, which typically hold their assets in cold storage without actively generating yield.

    Coinbase Custody will be responsible for the safekeeping of the NEAR tokens, while BNY Mellon will provide cash custody and administrative services. The fund’s annual management fee has been set at 0.75%.

    The trust was established as a Delaware statutory trust in April 2025, indicating a regulatory journey of approximately 17 months from its formation to the recent listing approval.

    Initial seed capital for the filing was modest, comprising 8 shares valued at $25 each, totaling $200 in net assets as of July 28, 2026. A planned subsequent seed basket of 20,000 shares, valued at $500,000, is expected to establish the necessary working capital base prior to the public debut.

    Following the news of the regulatory approvals, the price of NEAR’s token experienced a notable surge, climbing approximately 20% within 24 hours and extending its gains to around 26% over the subsequent week.

    It is important to note that the SEC’s approval of the registration statement does not constitute an endorsement of the NEAR Protocol token itself or the ETF security.

  • Aave Unlocks Tokenized US Stocks for USDC Collateral

    Aave Unlocks Tokenized US Stocks for USDC Collateral

    Aave V4 Launches Equities Hub on Base, Enabling Non-US Users to Borrow USDC Against Tokenized US Stocks

    Decentralized finance protocol Aave V4 has launched its Equities Hub on the Base network, allowing eligible non-US users to borrow USDC by using seven tokenized US stocks issued by Coinbase as collateral. This feature marks a significant expansion for Aave, extending its lending capabilities beyond purely crypto assets and tapping into the vast liquidity of the public equity markets, estimated at nearly $150 trillion, through tokenization.

    The Equities Hub went live on September 25th, initially listing seven tokenized stocks tracking major companies: Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla. All these assets are issued by Coinbase. Chainlink is providing on-chain pricing for these seven assets through its tokenized stock price feeds.

    The Equities Hub operates on Aave V4’s “Hub and Spoke” architecture, consolidating all stock collateral into a single USDC market. However, risk parameters are set independently for each asset. This design ensures that issues with one stock will not affect others, a crucial consideration given the varying volatility of US equities.

    Risk parameters set by Aave’s risk supplier, LlamaRisk, include a total collateral cap of approximately $29 million for the seven stocks, a USDC supply cap of $32 million, and a borrowing cap of $21 million. The collateral factor, which determines how much can be borrowed against an asset, ranges between 65% and 79%, depending on the specific stock.

    Currently, these seven tokenized stocks are only available as collateral and cannot be borrowed. Aave has indicated that it may introduce more tokenized stocks from Coinbase in the future, and potentially include GHO as a borrowable asset. However, any such additions would be subject to governance and risk assessments.

    Stani Kulechov, founder and CEO of Aave Labs, stated in an announcement that public equities represent one of the largest pools of capital globally, and tokenization is bringing this capital onto the blockchain. “Until now, tokenized stocks were just something you could hold or trade,” Kulechov said. “Today, they become collateral against which you can borrow.”

    This is not the first time Kulechov has highlighted the potential of tokenized assets. In a mid-September interview with The Block, he noted that institutions “bring scale,” which could drive a substantial increase in on-chain lending demand. He believes that tokenization and DeFi are no longer technical challenges but rather marketing and adoption issues.

    Following the obstruction of the CLARITY Act in the Senate by a vote of 49 to 50, Kulechov suggested that DeFi might need to adopt an “Uber-like” strategy, expanding to a sufficient user base to compel lawmakers to address regulatory concerns.

    This collaboration involves three key players: Aave providing the DeFi lending protocol, Coinbase issuing the tokenized stocks, and Chainlink supplying the on-chain pricing.

    Johann Eid, Chief Business Officer at Chainlink, commented that Aave’s adoption of Coinbase’s tokenized stocks, coupled with Chainlink as the official oracle solution, is a significant step towards bringing the global stock market, valued at over $150 trillion, onto the blockchain.

    Antonio García-Martínez, Head of Growth at Base, pointed out that eligible clients outside the US can now borrow USDC using these stocks, while USDC providers can earn interest. This initiative introduces a new source of liquidity to the Base ecosystem and creates a closed loop with Coinbase’s own tokenized stock offerings.

    Aave has accumulated $3.6 trillion in deposits and facilitated over $1 trillion in total loans. The introduction of tokenized US stocks positions the protocol to move beyond pure crypto lending towards broader real-world asset (RWA) collateralized lending. However, the initial cap of $29 million is considered conservative and still a distance from attracting institutional-grade capital.

    Two key areas to watch in the future are whether LlamaRisk will relax the collateral cap and whether Aave will allow tokenized stocks to be borrowed as assets, not just used as collateral. If institutions can directly borrow tokenized stocks on-chain for shorting or hedging, Aave would truly become a cross-asset lending protocol. In the short term, this launch appears more like a technical validation, with the stability of the Hub and Spoke architecture in handling traditional asset risk parameters being a critical determinant for future steps.

  • Bitget Hackers Move $83M XRP; XRPL Freeze Unsupportable, Ripple Powerless

    Bitget Hackers Move $83M XRP; XRPL Freeze Unsupportable, Ripple Powerless

    Hackers Move Over Half of Stolen XRP, XRPL’s Lack of Freeze Functionality Leaves Ripple Powerless

    Hackers involved in the Bitget exchange breach have significantly moved over half of the 103 million XRP tokens, valued at approximately $83 million, that were initially stolen. The XRP Ledger (XRPL), however, does not support a freeze function, leaving payment company Ripple unable to intervene.

    According to on-chain records from the XRP Ledger, approximately 54 million XRP, worth around $83 million, has been transferred out of five initial wallets controlled by the hackers. This represents more than half of the stolen XRP, with less than half of the compromised assets remaining accessible.

    Unlike stablecoins such as Circle’s USDC and Tether’s USDT, which can be frozen on their respective blockchains by blacklisting addresses, XRP, the native currency of the XRP Ledger, lacks this inherent freeze capability. While Ripple issues its own tokens on the chain, it does not possess control over transactions involving native XRP.

    This technical limitation means that as long as the XRP remains within wallets controlled by the hackers, there is no mechanism to prevent its movement or sale. Recovery efforts are contingent on the hackers transferring the XRP to an exchange that does support freeze functionality, allowing that exchange to restrict the account and block withdrawals.

    The pace of the hackers’ transfers notably accelerated on Saturday. At 04:32 UTC, the five wallets held approximately 70 million XRP. Eight hours later, this figure had dwindled to just 49 million XRP. The hackers have been observed distributing the funds across a larger number of wallets, with some transfers following routes previously utilized by the initial wallet.

    One attempted transfer of approximately 521,000 XRP failed due to insufficient balance in the originating account. Roughly an hour later, a second wallet sent the same amount to the same recipient, suggesting a deliberate fund allocation strategy rather than random activity.

    XRP was trading around $1.54 on Saturday, marking a roughly 4% decline over the preceding 24 hours, though it maintained a 9% gain for the week. At this price, the initially stolen 103 million XRP was valued at approximately $160 million, representing about 4% of XRP’s daily trading volume of around $4.4 billion.

    The actual impact on XRP’s price from a large-scale sell-off would depend on market depth. However, current transfer patterns suggest the hackers are prioritizing diversification and holding rather than immediate liquidation, potentially to avoid triggering significant market volatility associated with large sell orders.

    Bitget revised its total stolen amount to $387.5 million on Friday, an increase from the initial estimate of $350 million, to include assets stolen from the Zcash and TRON chains. The exchange confirmed these were all part of the same attack and not new incidents.

    Bitget reiterated that its protection fund will fully cover the losses, ensuring user funds remain unaffected. The planned phased resumption of withdrawals is as follows: Bitcoin on September 28, Ethereum on September 29, USDT on September 30, and other cryptocurrencies on October 2.

  • Ethereum Approaches $2,800 Resistance Amidst Uncertainty and Shifting Market Dynamics

    Ethereum Approaches $2,800 Resistance Amidst Uncertainty and Shifting Market Dynamics

    Ethereum is currently positioned near a significant technical hurdle at the $2,800 resistance level, a point that has historically influenced its recent price action. While the cryptocurrency has recently reclaimed its 200-day moving average—a move analysts suggest could signal a bullish reversal—its ability to decisively break through $2,800 remains a key uncertainty, poised to dictate its short-term market direction.

    Technical Landscape: Reclaiming Averages and Historical Levels

    The rally that began in August and gained momentum in September has led Ethereum to reclaim its 200-day moving average and push into the $2,800 region. This level has acted as both support and resistance multiple times over the past two years, often preceding significant price movements. Daan Crypto Traders highlighted that a weekly close above the 200-day moving average and exponential moving average has solidified a bullish reversal structure. However, the $2,800 level stands as a primary obstacle, and its successful conversion into support could pave the way for further upward movement towards the $3,000 to $4,000 range.

    Market Dynamics: Leverage and Selling Pressure

    Market dynamics surrounding leverage have also shifted. According to CW, the size of Ethereum’s high-leverage positions has decreased significantly, with long positions reportedly falling to approximately $2.1 billion and short positions standing near $4 billion. This reduction in leverage occurred after many accumulated high-leverage positions were liquidated. Merlijn The Trader has indicated that much of the forced selling pressure may have already been absorbed during an earlier drawdown, suggesting that the market might be better positioned for upward volatility. However, this reduced positioning also leaves Ethereum vulnerable to increased volatility as it approaches the critical $2,800 resistance.

    Analyst Perspectives: Interpreting the Signals

    Analyst sentiment, while largely constructive, emphasizes the prevailing uncertainty. Michaël van de Poppe has expressed a view that a strong upside notable move for Ethereum is a matter of time. Yet, the broader market context suggests that while the higher-timeframe trend has improved, the market must still suggest its ability to turn the stubborn $2,800 resistance zone into support. Merlijn The Trader concluded that Ethereum’s recent performance, which has seen it rise 80% from its July bottom, might have been underestimated this cycle.

    Conclusion: Navigating Uncertainty

    Ultimately, Ethereum’s path forward hinges on its ability to overcome the $2,800 resistance. While technical indicators and analyst sentiment point towards potential upside, the historical significance of this level and the inherent volatility associated with such junctures mean that the outcome remains uncertain. the market may be closely watching whether Ethereum can convert this key resistance into a new support base, or if it may face a rejection that could lead to increased price fluctuations.

  • AMD Surges 300%, Hits $1 Trillion Market Cap

    AMD Surges 300%, Hits $1 Trillion Market Cap

    AMD Surpasses $1 Trillion Market Cap, Joins Elite Semiconductor Club

    Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) has achieved a remarkable milestone, crossing a valuation threshold that seemed improbable just a few years ago. On September 21, 2026, AMD’s market capitalization surged past $1 trillion for the first time, marking it as the fourth U.S. semiconductor company to reach this valuation.

    The company’s stock experienced a significant surge, hitting an intraday high of approximately $616 and closing around $613, reflecting a roughly 10% increase in a single trading day. Year-to-date in 2026, AMD’s stock has climbed an impressive 180% to 187%, significantly outperforming Nvidia’s return of approximately 21% to 23% over the same period. Nvidia currently holds a market capitalization of roughly $5.4 trillion.

    Strong Q2 Results Fuel Investor Enthusiasm

    AMD’s second-quarter 2026 financial results provided investors with substantial reasons for optimism. The company reported total revenue of $11.54 billion, a 50% increase compared to the same quarter in the previous year. The data center segment was a particular highlight, with revenue reaching $6.7 billion, a remarkable 107% year-over-year increase.

    AI Workloads Drive Growth for EPYC and Instinct

    The robust growth is largely attributed to AMD’s EPYC server CPUs and Instinct GPUs, which have become integral components for large-scale artificial intelligence training and inference workloads. Key customers deploying AMD’s silicon include Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Anthropic, in particular, is reportedly making significant investments in AMD’s MI450 GPUs. Meta currently accounts for approximately 5.5% of AMD’s total revenue.

    A Select Group of Chipmakers

    AMD now joins a distinguished list of U.S. chipmakers that have surpassed the $1 trillion market capitalization mark: Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron.

    Challenging the Incumbent in the AI Arena

    AMD’s achievement is particularly noteworthy as the company continues to operate as a challenger in a market dominated by Nvidia. Nvidia’s $5.4 trillion valuation significantly overshadows AMD’s milestone. Nvidia’s H100 and Blackwell chips remain the preferred choice for major AI training initiatives, and its CUDA software ecosystem presents considerable switching costs that are difficult to overcome with hardware specifications alone.

    AMD’s strategy for hyperscale customers centers on addressing the risks of supply concentration. The company emphasizes that its ROCm software stack has matured sufficiently to support major workloads with competitive performance. For companies like Microsoft and Meta, which are investing tens of billions annually in AI infrastructure, even a 20% allocation to AMD hardware translates into substantial contract volumes.

    Future Outlook and Customer Concentration

    The issue of customer concentration warrants close observation. While Meta’s approximately 5.5% contribution to revenue is significant, the growing list of major clients such as Microsoft, OpenAI, and Anthropic suggests a path toward diversification. However, the exceptional 107% growth rate in the data center segment is expected to normalize as the comparison base expands.

  • CFTC Clarifies Tokenized Asset Use for Futures Firms with No Action Letter

    CFTC Clarifies Tokenized Asset Use for Futures Firms with No Action Letter

    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has issued a “No Action Letter” this week, establishing a regulatory pathway for futures commission merchants (RIAs) to manage client funds using tokenized assets and to accept blockchain ledgers as official records. This guidance, a direct response to a petition from the Futures Association (FIA), clarifies bookkeeping and record-keeping requirements under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) in the context of tokenized assets.

    The “No Action Letter” permits RIAs to utilize tokenized traditional assets for client fund management and employ blockchain technology for official record-keeping, provided specific conditions are met. These include ensuring that the tokenized assets are investable under U.S. federal or state law, that investment decisions remain with the regulated RIA, and that on-chain records are verifiable, immutable, and fully accessible to the CFTC for enforcement.

    This development is poised to streamline operations for futures firms by potentially eliminating the need for parallel ledgers, thereby reducing compliance costs associated with tokenized assets. The FIA has stated that this guidance removes a significant hurdle for asset tokenization within the futures industry, suggesting a potential acceleration in the expansion of real-world asset (RWA) tokenization.

    It is important to note that the CFTC’s guidance specifically applies to tokenized traditional assets, such as tokenized Treasuries, commercial paper, structured products, and stocks, and does not extend to crypto-native assets like Bitcoin or Ethereum. The “No Action Letter” serves as informal guidance, not a formal regulation, and applies solely to CFTC-regulated futures commission merchants, not to SEC-regulated advisors or banks.

    The CFTC’s action complements recent regulatory steps, such as the SEC’s exemption for on-chain U.S. stock trading. While other bodies like the SEC and Federal Reserve continue to explore regulations for stablecoins and tokenized assets, the CFTC’s stance offers a defined framework for a segment of the financial market. However, uncertainties remain regarding the precise standards for blockchain record verifiability, immutability, and accessibility as defined by the CFTC, and the extent to which other regulatory bodies will adopt similar guidance is yet to be determined.

    Why This Matters

    The materials describe a narrow update: The CFTC released a No Action Letter in response to a petition from the FIA, clarifying that registered futures commission merchants (RIAs) can use tokenized assets to manage client funds and use blockchain ledgers as official records, provided certain conditions are met. The specific conditions under which blockchain records are deemed ‘verifiable, immutable, and fully accessible’ by the CFTC.

    Broader Context

    Source materials place the factual news in this context: CFTC issued ‘No Action Letter’.

  • Tether Partner Bank Frozen by US with $89M; USDT Stable, But Stablecoin Risks Exposed

    Tether Partner Bank Frozen by US with $89M; USDT Stable, But Stablecoin Risks Exposed

    Tether’s Partner Bank Faces Asset Freeze, Highlighting Stablecoin Counterparty Risk

    Tether, the issuer of the world’s largest stablecoin, USDT, confirmed on Thursday that its partner bank, EQIBank, has had $89 million in assets frozen by U.S. prosecutors. While this represents a relatively small portion of Tether’s overall holdings, the incident underscores the persistent counterparty risk inherent in the banking relationships underpinning stablecoins.

    A Tether representative stated that the frozen assets constitute “less than 0.034%” of the group’s total assets, which stood at $18.775 billion as of June. This translates to approximately $6.4 million, a figure that would have a negligible impact on Tether’s reserve ratios and poses no direct threat to USDT’s peg to the U.S. dollar.

    However, the asset freeze, as reported by the Financial Times and The Information, has illuminated an often-overlooked risk for stablecoin issuers. Stablecoins do not directly hold U.S. dollars; instead, they rely on a complex network of banks and payment processors to manage customer deposits and redemptions.

    EQIBank’s funds originated from payment processor Capstone, which held funds for EQIBank within the U.S. and routed customer money through accounts at Wells Fargo and JP Morgan. According to court filings, Capstone allegedly misrepresented its business activities to the banks.

    U.S. prosecutors subsequently seized funds from these accounts and initiated civil forfeiture proceedings, accusing Capstone of misrepresenting its business model to financial institutions. EQIBank later announced that the $89 million freeze included cryptocurrency assets, such as 450,000 BTC and 150,000 ETH.

    In an email, a Tether representative stated, “Tether was unaware of Capstone’s actions” and reiterated that the EQIBank assets held by the group represented “less than 0.034% of the group’s assets.”

    Tether’s total assets, as declared in June, included approximately 50% in short-term U.S. Treasury bills maturing within one year, with the remainder held by custodian banks in New York and various partner institutions. EQIBank was responsible for facilitating wire transfers for USDT purchases and redemptions but did not hold Tether’s primary reserves.

    In contrast, Circle, the issuer of USDC, employs a more transparent strategy, holding assets across multiple banks and clearinghouses in various jurisdictions and publishing monthly reserve details.

    Meanwhile, EQIBank also provides banking services to several cryptocurrency exchanges, including processing some transactions for Binance, Kraken, and Coinbase. This interconnectedness means that the failure of a single banking partner could simultaneously impact the liquidity of multiple platforms.

    This incident demonstrates that even a stablecoin leader like Tether is not entirely immune to banking risks. The operational model of stablecoins depends on a chain of “banking conduits,” from deposit banks to payment processors and clearinghouses, each presenting potential counterparty risks.

    Compared to the liquidation of Bitcoin holdings, the risks associated with stablecoins are more “institutional” in nature, driven not by market sentiment but by the operational efficiency of the funding channels themselves.

    While a hypothetical collapse of EQIBank would reduce Tether’s reserve ratio by 0.034%, it would not materially affect USDT’s dollar peg. However, the event serves as a reminder that stablecoin “reserves” are not entirely insulated and are distributed across a network of banks and payment processors.

    Future observations will focus on whether Tether will disclose more detailed reserve breakdowns and whether EQIBank’s network of banking partners harbors additional potential liquidity risks.

  • Bitcoin and Ethereum Hold Steady as Crypto Market Sentiment Moderates

    Bitcoin and Ethereum Hold Steady as Crypto Market Sentiment Moderates

    The cryptocurrency market is currently experiencing a period of relative stability for its leading assets, Bitcoin and Ethereum. However, this calm on the price front is accompanied by a cooling of investor optimism, as indicated by a decline in the market’s Fear and Greed Index. Significant liquidation events also underscore the underlying volatility that persists beneath the surface.

    On September 27, Bitcoin was trading around $84,300, while Ethereum held above $2,693. These prices represent a continuation of range-bound consolidation for the major cryptocurrencies. Despite this price stability, the past 24 hours saw substantial activity in the derivatives market, with a total of $111.72 million in crypto futures contracts being liquidated. According to CoinGlass data, $62.61 million were long positions and $49.11 million were short positions, affecting a total of 54,925 traders. The largest single liquidation recorded was $3.17 million on Hyperliquid for XRP-USD contracts.

    In line with the market’s current mood, Alternative.me’s Fear and Greed Index dropped from 74 to 70 on September 27. While this score still resides within the ‘greed’ zone, the decrease signifies a slight pullback from more extreme levels of optimism. The index has been fluctuating between 70 and 78 over the past eight days, reaching a high of 78 on September 22. This suggests that while investors remain generally optimistic, the fervent greed seen earlier in the week has moderated.

    Technical Indicators Signal Cautious Optimism

    Technical analysis for Bitcoin reveals a generally bullish trend. Its price is currently above key moving averages, including the 20-day ($80,186), 50-day ($75,739), and 200-day ($71,038) simple moving averages. The price also sits above the middle Bollinger Band ($80,186), with the upper band pressure at $87,300. Bitcoin’s Relative Strength Index (RSI(14)) stands at 65.1. However, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator shows a bullish trend but with weakening momentum, hinting at potential consolidation.

    Ethereum’s technical indicators present a similar picture. The cryptocurrency is trading above its 20-day ($2,568), 50-day ($2,373), and 200-day ($2,099) SMAs. Its RSI(14) is at 63.9, and its price is above the middle Bollinger Band ($2,568), with the upper Bollinger Band pressure at $2,801. Like Bitcoin, Ethereum’s MACD indicates a bullish trend but with diminishing momentum.

    Altcoin Performance and Broader Influences

    Other cryptocurrencies have shown mixed performance. XRP experienced a 2.95% decline in the last 24 hours, trading at $1.5177, though it has seen a significant rebound from its recent low of $1.263. Solana (SOL) was trading at $120.82, down 0.56%. The Alpenglow upgrade in the Solana ecosystem is viewed as a positive development for SOL.

    Broader market influences, such as US Treasury yields and remarks from Federal Reserve officials, continue to play a role in shaping risk asset prices. Market participants remain divided on the future path of the Fed’s interest rate policies, contributing to the current market uncertainty.

    In summary, the crypto market is navigating a phase characterized by stable prices for major assets, but with underlying volatility evident in liquidation data and a slightly tempered investor sentiment. The technical indicators for Bitcoin and Ethereum suggest a bullish outlook, albeit with weakening momentum, reinforcing the need for a balanced approach to market analysis.

    Why This Matters

    The materials describe a narrow update: Bitcoin held above $84,300 and Ethereum stayed above $2,693. The future direction of the crypto market in the short term.

    Broader Context

    Source materials place the factual news in this context: Previous reports indicated higher liquidation amounts and a rising fear index.

  • Tokenized Asset Count Surges to 1,473 This Year

    Tokenized Asset Count Surges to 1,473 This Year

    Mantle Network Reports Explosive Growth in Tokenized Assets

    Mantle Network is experiencing a significant surge in its tokenized asset business, with both the number of assets on its platform and their total value reaching unprecedented levels. The network now hosts 1,473 tokenized assets, a dramatic increase from just 71 at the start of 2026. Concurrently, the Distributed Asset Value has climbed to approximately $476.1 million, marking a roughly 110% increase over the past 30 days.

    Asset Count Surges More Than Twentyfold

    The growth in Mantle’s tokenized asset count has been substantial, more than twentyfold since January. This expansion goes beyond typical month-to-month fluctuations often seen in Total Value Locked (TVL) metrics. The network attributes this acceleration to a broadening array of tokenized products, including equities, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), regulated stablecoins, and yield-bearing assets. Key issuers and infrastructure providers within the Mantle ecosystem include xStocks, Securitize, Ethena, and Paxos.

    Beyond Issuance: Focus on Distribution

    The increasing diversity of tokenized assets, encompassing stocks, funds, stablecoins, and structured products, signifies a maturation of the tokenization market beyond its initial focus on Treasury products. While the technical and legal challenges of representing regulated financial assets on public blockchains are increasingly being addressed, Mantle is emphasizing the crucial next stage: distribution.

    The network aims to facilitate the liquidity, collateral use, settlement, and integration of these tokenized assets by connecting issuers with exchanges, custodians, market makers, and decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols. This strategic positioning focuses on the ecosystem’s ability to distribute assets, a factor Mantle believes will capture as much value as the issuance itself.

    While the $476 million figure remains modest compared to traditional securities markets, the rapid pace of growth is a significant indicator. The jump from 71 to 1,473 tokenized assets in less than a year suggests a rapidly expanding ecosystem, moving beyond a few dominant products to a more robust and diversified market. Tokenized finance is beginning to resemble a functional market rather than a series of isolated experiments.

  • Bitcoin Surges 44% in Strong Q3; Ethereum Soars 71%

    Bitcoin Surges 44% in Strong Q3; Ethereum Soars 71%

    Bitcoin Poised for Strongest Third Quarter in Years, Ethereum Achieves Record Performance

    Bitcoin is on track for its second-best third quarter on record, while ethereum has already secured its strongest Q3 performance to date. With the month of September nearing its close, robust demand for exchange-traded funds (ETFs), increased spot market activity, and limited profit-taking are fueling speculation about bitcoin’s potential to sustain its current rally. Ethereum has seen a significant surge of 71%, as bitcoin continues its upward trajectory.