Tag: Regulation & Policy

  • Sony: Digital Games Aren’t Owned

    Sony: Digital Games Aren’t Owned

    Sony Contends Digital Game Purchases Grant Licenses, Not Ownership

    Sony has informed a federal judge that consumers do not reasonably believe they own the digital games they purchase through the PlayStation Store, according to a filing reviewed by Game File on August 21.

    This submission marks the company’s initial substantive response to a proposed class-action lawsuit filed in June in the Northern District of California by four PlayStation customers. The plaintiffs allege that the store’s “Buy Now” and “Confirm Purchase” buttons create a false impression of ownership, when in reality, the transaction grants only a revocable license.

    The lawsuit’s primary claim is brought under Section 17500.6 of California’s false advertising law, which was enacted by AB 2426 and took effect in January 2025. This statute prohibits sellers from using terms like “buy,” “purchase,” or any other language that a reasonable person would interpret as conferring unrestricted ownership, unless the checkout process includes a clear and conspicuous statement, in plain language, that the purchase of a digital good constitutes a license.

    Sony asserts that its checkout process already fulfills this requirement. Fine print within the shopping cart directs users to the PlayStation Terms of Service and the Software Product License Agreement. The terms of service, in the eighth of 18 sections, explicitly state that customers “do not own the product.” Similarly, the license agreement clarifies that the software is “licensed to you, not sold,” a detail presented several hundred words into the document.

    The filing further argues that the concept of ownership is not something a buyer could plausibly expect in this context. Sony’s legal team pointed to the example of Jason Mendoza purchasing “Resident Evil Requiem” on February 14 and Edward Heycock buying the same game for $69.99 on February 25. The lawyers contended that if Mendoza had truly owned the game, Heycock would not have been able to purchase it, rendering it “not plausible to allege that reasonable consumers believed they were obtaining ‘ownership’” of a digital game.

    Sony’s principal request, as reported by Game File, is for the judge to compel the dispute into private arbitration, citing that PlayStation’s terms of service commit users to settle claims through this method. The arguments regarding ownership would only apply if the judge denies this arbitration request.

    Arbitration serves to eliminate the risk of a jury verdict, and PlayStation’s terms of service include an express class-action waiver that mandates claims be brought individually.

    Sony announced on July 1 that it will cease production of physical discs for new PlayStation games starting in January 2028, leaving the PlayStation Store and digital retailers as the sole avenues for new releases. Sony Group is reportedly also planning a dollar-denominated stablecoin for transactions across its digital ecosystem.

    The judge has not yet issued a ruling on the arbitration request.

  • Ireland’s New State Savings Scheme Excludes Cryptocurrency

    Ireland’s New State Savings Scheme Excludes Cryptocurrency

    Ireland is launching a new tax-advantaged state savings scheme next year, designed to encourage domestic investment in traditional financial products, but it may explicitly exclude cryptocurrency assets. This move signals a cautious regulatory approach by the Irish government towards digital assets.

    The scheme, expected to open for accounts next year, will permit investments in shares, bonds, funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and insurance-based products. Details on contribution thresholds and tax rates are scheduled for announcement on Budget day, October 6.

    Minister for Public Expenditure, Simon Harris, stated the scheme aims to “make a real difference in building up your own economic resilience.” It targets the approximately $203 billion (€175 billion) held in Irish household deposit accounts. This initiative comes as Irish households demonstrate a lower propensity for direct investments and investment funds compared to the EU average, holding only 2.3% of their financial assets in direct investments and 2.2% in investment funds, according to Central Bank of Ireland research published in late 2025.

    The exclusion of crypto assets aligns with broader governmental efforts to enhance financial crime prevention and anti-money laundering measures. Ireland launched its first national anti-money laundering strategy on August 13, introducing enhanced checks on transfers involving private wallets and stricter due diligence on firms dealing with overseas crypto companies. This strategy builds on a June action plan that identified crypto-asset misuse as an evolving financial-crime threat.

    While the new savings scheme will not accommodate cryptocurrencies, approximately 10% of Irish adults reportedly own digital assets, with an average holding of €2,266. The government’s stance, evidenced by the savings scheme’s exclusion and recent anti-money laundering measures, suggests a deliberate effort to channel savings into more traditional and regulated financial products.

    In parallel, the tax treatment of eligible investments is under review. The tax rate for deemed disposal, a tax on the increase in value of certain assets, was previously cut from 41% to 38% and is being further considered, with a government report recommending its potential scrapping. This contrasts with the outright exclusion of crypto from the new savings scheme.

    Key uncertainties remain regarding the precise contribution caps and tax thresholds for the new savings scheme, which will be fully announced in Budget 2027. The scheme’s introduction is part of a broader effort to encourage domestic investment and financial resilience among Irish tax residents, who are entitled to one account each. Contributions up to a tax-free threshold will be exempt from tax, while amounts exceeding this may be subject to a low, annual flat rate. There will be no minimum contribution or lock-in period, though an annual contribution cap will apply.

    The government’s approach prioritizes traditional financial instruments while maintaining a cautious stance on the cryptocurrency market.

    This story matters because Ireland’s decision to exclude cryptocurrency from its new state savings scheme reflects a broader regulatory trend. By channeling domestic savings into traditional assets, the government aims to bolster economic resilience and align with anti-money laundering efforts, despite a segment of the population holding digital assets. This cautious approach to crypto, contrasted with incentives for traditional investments, highlights Ireland’s evolving stance on digital assets within the European financial landscape.

    Why This Matters

    The materials describe a narrow update: Ireland is launching a new state savings scheme for tax-resident adults, which will allow investments in shares, bonds, funds, ETFs, and insurance-based products. The exact thresholds and rates for the tax-free and flat-rate contributions.

    Broader Context

    Source materials place the factual news in this context: The target is the roughly $203 billion (€175 billion) sitting in Irish household deposit accounts.

  • Bitcoin ETF Inflows Reverse Amidst Divergent Regulatory Outlook for Digital Assets

    Bitcoin ETF Inflows Reverse Amidst Divergent Regulatory Outlook for Digital Assets

    U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) experienced a reversal in investment flows at the end of last week, concluding a nine-day streak of inflows. This development occurs as regulatory clarity for Bitcoin appears more established compared to that for more complex digital assets like decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols and altcoins, with the CLARITY Act’s progress remaining uncertain.

    Robert Mitchnick, BlackRock’s head of digital assets, stated that the CLARITY Act, officially known as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (H.R. 3633), is less critical for Bitcoin than for other segments of the crypto market. He indicated that institutional investors do not consider further legislation a base-case assumption for Bitcoin, viewing potential regulatory progress as an upside rather than a requirement. This contrasts with the DeFi and altcoin sectors, where Mitchnick described the regulatory landscape as unsettled.

    The recent shift in ETF flows saw a nine-day inflow streak, which had accumulated $2.8 billion, come to an end. While specific daily figures for the outflows were not detailed, the trend marks a pause in the consistent demand observed previously. BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) was noted as leading inflows on the preceding Thursday with $277 million. Overall, Bitcoin ETFs have seen cumulative net inflows totaling $55 billion, with total net assets reaching $98.6 billion, as Bitcoin traded near $78,500.

    Mitchnick’s perspective suggests that Bitcoin’s institutional case is not contingent on the passage of new legislation. This is in contrast to the broader digital asset market, where regulatory uncertainty persists. The CLARITY Act has passed the House of Representatives, according to Congress.gov, but its latest recorded action is a Senate cloture motion from August 8, 2026, indicating it has not yet been enacted into law.

    BlackRock has been expanding its digital asset offerings. Beyond its Bitcoin ETF, the firm has introduced Ethereum-based products, including both staking and non-staking options. This summer, BlackRock also launched a Bitcoin premium income product designed to offer investors potential upside while generating yield and moderating volatility. Furthermore, Mitchnick noted opportunities for stablecoins beyond trading, including applications in cross-border payments and capital markets, with the implementation of the Genius Act approaching.

    The divergence in regulatory outlooks may influence institutional investment strategies. While Bitcoin appears to have a more defined regulatory path, the uncertainty surrounding DeFi and other complex crypto assets could present challenges or opportunities for investors navigating the evolving digital asset space. The CLARITY Act’s progress, or lack thereof, remains a key factor in shaping the future regulatory environment for these markets.

    Why This Matters

    The materials describe a narrow update: U. The ultimate impact and timeline of the CLARITY Act on different crypto assets.

    Broader Context

    Source materials place the factual news in this context: U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs turned negative at the end of last week, ending a nine-day inflow streak that had brought in a total of $2.8 billion.

  • CFTC Settles Insider Trading Case Against Former White House Operator in Prediction Markets

    CFTC Settles Insider Trading Case Against Former White House Operator in Prediction Markets

    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has reached a $172,000 settlement with Gabriel Perez, a former teleprompter operator for the White House, resolving allegations of insider trading in prediction markets. The settlement addresses claims that Perez exploited advance knowledge of presidential speeches to profit from trades on platforms such as Kalshi.

    According to the CFTC’s order, Perez allegedly misappropriated confidential government information between December 2025 and February 2026. His role provided him with access to speeches before they were delivered, allowing him to place trades on prediction markets tied to specific words or phrases President Donald Trump might use. The agency stated that Perez was able to wager on outcomes he already knew, generating more than $107,500 in profits.

    Under the terms of the settlement, Perez must disgorge $107,539.02 in gains and pay a $65,000 civil penalty. He has also agreed to a three-year ban from trading on CFTC-regulated markets. The regulator noted that the penalty was significantly discounted under a new cooperation policy, citing Perez’s “exemplary assistance with the investigation.” The exchange operator Kalshi also assisted with the case.

    The CFTC views this order as a clear example of the insider-trading risks associated with prediction markets, which have seen a surge in popularity and volume. The agency asserts its authority over such event contracts, considering them swaps subject to insider-trading rules.

    This case follows similar incidents that have drawn regulatory attention to prediction markets. Earlier this year, a U.S. soldier faced charges related to alleged trading on Polymarket, with gains reportedly exceeding $400,000, tied to an operation that ousted Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro. In March, a video editor for the popular YouTuber MrBeast was reportedly fired amid an insider-trading probe by Kalshi.

    In response to mounting scrutiny and potential misuse of non-public information, platforms like Kalshi have been implementing new safeguards and working through suspicious-activity reviews. Prediction markets, which allow users to bet on real-world outcomes, are drawing billions in volume, increasing their visibility and regulatory oversight.

    The CFTC’s action underscores its expectation that event contracts will fall under its purview, reinforcing the application of insider-trading rules to these evolving financial instruments. The settlement with Perez highlights the ongoing challenges in regulating these markets and the potential for individuals with access to non-public information to exploit them.

    Why This Matters

    This settlement provides a concrete example of insider trading in prediction markets, underscoring the CFTC’s intent to regulate these platforms and the potential for misuse of non-public information. The case demonstrates the practical implications of regulatory actions on prediction markets and highlights the evolving framework for event contracts.

    Broader Context

    Source materials place the factual news in this context: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission said Friday that Gabriel Perez misappropriated confidential government information to trade “presidential mention market” contracts, event contracts that pay out based on specific words or phrases a president uses in a speech.

  • Sanders Pledges Bill to Halt AI Mass Surveillance

    Sanders Pledges Bill to Halt AI Mass Surveillance

    Sanders Targets Surveillance Camera Company, Citing AI and “Totalitarianism” Fears

    Senator Bernie Sanders has announced his intention to introduce legislation targeting surveillance camera company Flock Safety, warning that artificial intelligence is propelling the United States toward a “surveillance state.”

    In a lengthy post on X on Wednesday, the independent senator from Vermont framed the issue in stark terms, opening with the declaration “STOP FLOCK. STOP AI MASS SURVEILLANCE.” He cautioned that unchecked tracking technology risks steering the U.S. toward totalitarianism.

    Sanders stated that Flock, which he described as backed by tech figures Marc Andreessen and Peter Thiel, has deployed over 120,000 AI-powered cameras nationwide. These cameras, he noted, scan and record 20 billion vehicles monthly across more than 6,000 communities.

    The senator argued that the company’s reach extends into daily life, asserting that wherever Flock operates, its cameras log residents dropping off children at school, visiting doctors, or going on dates. He also highlighted newer capabilities, contending that Flock’s AI can cross-reference images of individuals and their vehicles with databases of phone numbers, relatives, and court records to identify people and track their movements. Sanders concluded his post by promising to introduce a bill to curb the technology.

    The pledge adds a prominent voice to a growing bipartisan backlash against Flock’s automated license plate readers. Opposition has already surfaced on Capitol Hill, with Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky announcing plans for legislation to withhold federal funding from agencies that utilize the cameras. Local governments, from Los Angeles to Monroe County, Indiana, have suspended or canceled contracts due to privacy concerns, while activists in numerous states have vandalized or disabled the devices.

    Flock, an Atlanta-based company founded in 2017, maintains that its cameras do not employ facial recognition and typically retain footage for 30 days. CEO Garrett Langley has argued that critics often change their views once they understand the technology primarily photographs vehicles. He recently apologized for previously labeling anti-Flock activists a “terroristic organization.”

    In an interview with FOX News earlier this week, Langley urged Americans to “compromise” on their privacy, suggesting that citizens should prioritize safety over surveillance concerns.

    Flock has pursued aggressive expansion over the past year, including a nationwide plate-scanning initiative involving Uber drivers and a police tool for tracking drivers.

    Senator Sanders did not specify a timeline for introducing his proposed bill.

  • UAE Sheikh Linked to Trump Crypto Bank: 49% Stake, $500M Raise Questions

    UAE Sheikh Linked to Trump Crypto Bank: 49% Stake, $500M Raise Questions

    UAE Official Linked to Largest Stake in Trump Crypto Bank Venture

    Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed al Nahyan and his co-investors are reportedly the largest shareholders in the holding company established for World Liberty Financial’s planned U.S. banking venture, according to sources cited by The Wall Street Journal. This entity holds a 49% stake in the holding company, positioning Tahnoon-linked investors as the primary stakeholders behind the Trump family’s cryptocurrency venture’s banking initiative.

    This ownership structure follows a significant $500 million investment in World Liberty Financial last year, also backed by Tahnoon, which secured him a 49% stake in the company. The new development deepens the business ties between the Trump-backed crypto firm and a senior foreign government official.

    Preliminary Approval for Banking Venture

    World Liberty Financial recently received preliminary conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to establish a federally chartered national trust bank. The proposed bank is slated to handle the issuance, redemption, and safeguarding of USD1, World Liberty’s dollar-backed stablecoin launched last year.

    This preliminary approval places the planned bank at the core of World Liberty Financial’s stablecoin operations and highlights the ownership of its holding company, where Tahnoon and his co-investors are reported to hold the largest share.

    Sheikh Tahnoon’s Role and Financial Influence

    Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed, who serves as the United Arab Emirates’ national security adviser and is the brother of the country’s president, is identified as a key backer of the Trump family’s new crypto bank. He reportedly oversees a vast financial empire, estimated to be worth over $1.3 trillion, funded by both personal wealth and state resources.

    While the report details the size of the stake and the investors involved, it does not provide specifics on the banking venture’s board composition, governance rights, or any veto arrangements tied to the ownership position. These details are considered crucial for understanding how the holding company’s ownership will influence the venture’s operations.

    The reporting establishes a substantial financial connection between World Liberty Financial and investors associated with a high-ranking UAE official. However, it does not indicate that Sheikh Tahnoon personally directs the planned bank’s daily management or dictates its U.S. regulatory strategy. Sheikh Tahnoon has been referred to in some media coverage as the “spy sheikh,” but the Journal’s report focuses on his official role and the ownership stake, without linking the nickname to operational control of the bank.

    The proposed bank’s role in managing USD1, the dollar-backed stablecoin, is central to the OCC’s preliminary approval. However, further details regarding the venture’s governance structure and the precise relationship between the holding company’s ownership and specific banking functions remain undisclosed.

  • SEC Declares Evernorth Holdings Registration Effective, Nasdaq Listing Path Contingent on Shareholder Vote and XRP Performance

    SEC Declares Evernorth Holdings Registration Effective, Nasdaq Listing Path Contingent on Shareholder Vote and XRP Performance

    The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has declared Evernorth Holdings’ registration effective, a procedural step that moves the XRP treasury company closer to a potential public listing on the Nasdaq. This effectiveness declaration clears the path for Evernorth to proceed with its planned merger with Armada, a Nasdaq-listed special purpose acquisition company (SPAC).

    The merger, however, remains contingent on Armada’s shareholder approval and other closing conditions. The shareholder vote is scheduled for September 30, with the deal targeted to close in late Q3 or early Q4 of this year. Armada shareholders have until September 28 to decide whether to redeem their shares. If the merger is approved and closes, the combined entity expects to trade on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol ‘XRPN’.

    It is crucial to note that the SEC’s effectiveness declaration does not constitute an endorsement of the merger, Evernorth’s business model, or XRP as an investment. It signifies that the necessary regulatory paperwork is in order for the shareholder vote to proceed.

    Evernorth operates as a digital asset treasury (DAT), a model that involves holding a cryptocurrency on its balance sheet and raising capital to acquire more of it, distinct from an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks a token’s price. This business model faces significant financial risks tied to XRP’s price volatility. The company announced plans in October with over $1 billion raised to buy XRP, and in late October, it spent approximately $947 million acquiring the digital asset. By February, this XRP stash was valued at about $446 million less than Evernorth paid for it.

    This financial exposure to XRP’s price fluctuations was evident on Friday, when XRP was trading near $1.37, down more than 5% on the day. XRP’s all-time high was $3.65 in July 2025. The viability of DAT stocks, including Evernorth’s model, relies on maintaining a premium to the value of their underlying crypto to facilitate continued capital raising and asset acquisition. A slump in the token’s price can erode this premium, potentially stalling the funding loop that supports the model.

    Evernorth founder and CEO Asheesh Birla has stated that the company aims to build an actively managed XRP treasury with the transparency and governance demanded by public markets. The company plans to deploy its treasury through DeFi yield generation, validator operations, and ecosystem investments. Backers of Evernorth include Ripple, Arrington Capital, SBI Group, Pantera Capital, Kraken, and GSR.

    The potential Nasdaq listing represents a significant step for Evernorth, which aims to become the world’s largest publicly traded XRP treasury company. However, the success of this venture is heavily dependent on shareholder approval and the unpredictable performance of XRP in the market. The uncertainties surrounding the merger’s completion and the future trading performance of XRPN on Nasdaq remain key considerations for potential investors.

    Why This Matters

    The SEC has declared Evernorth Holdings’ registration effective, allowing it to proceed with a merger with Armada, a Nasdaq-listed SPAC. The outcome of this merger is contingent on shareholder approval and the future performance of XRP.

    Broader Context

    Evernorth belongs to a category of company known as a digital asset treasury, or DAT—a publicly traded firm that holds a cryptocurrency on its balance sheet and raises fresh capital to buy more of it, rather than simply tracking the token’s price the way an ETF does.

  • Judge: Trump Admin Illegally Punished Anthropic Over AI Rules

    Judge: Trump Admin Illegally Punished Anthropic Over AI Rules

    Judge Rules Trump Administration Illegally Punished AI Firm Anthropic

    A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration unlawfully penalized the artificial intelligence company Anthropic for refusing to allow the military to use its Claude large language model for purposes such as mass surveillance of Americans and lethal autonomous warfare.

    The dispute originated when the Pentagon demanded Anthropic remove all usage restrictions and agree to a clause permitting “all lawful uses.” Anthropic acceded to most demands but maintained two core limitations. On February 27, then-President Trump ordered all federal agencies to cease using Anthropic’s technology, labeling the company a “RADICAL LEFT, WOKE COMPANY” on his social media platform, Truth Social. Former Pentagon official Anthony Hegseth subsequently accused Anthropic in a tweet of exhibiting “a master class in arrogance and betrayal” and barred any military contractor from engaging with the company.

    The government has since withdrawn its primary argument. Its initial risk assessment was predicated on the belief that Anthropic possessed backdoor access to deployed models. However, the government now concedes that Anthropic has no such access and that Claude poses no greater risk than any other “black box” system. This left only one remaining factor: trust, which a Pentagon memo stated was eroded by Anthropic’s “increasingly hostile manner through the press.”

    U.S. District Judge Jessica May Lin found the timeline of events undermined the government’s position. Days before Anthropic was blacklisted, Hegseth had suggested invoking the Defense Production Act, a move that would have positioned Anthropic as essential to national security. The day after the designation, an under secretary emailed Anthropic indicating a contract was “very close.” Lin also noted that the government is still in discussions with Anthropic regarding collaboration on Mythos, the company’s latest model, for use in sensitive contexts.

    “The empty invocation of national security is not a blank check to punish and retaliate against government critics,” Lin wrote, concluding that the administration’s actions were retaliatory under the First Amendment, imposed without the due process required by the Fifth Amendment, outside the scope of the relevant supply chain statute, and were arbitrary and capricious.

    Anthropic did not achieve a complete victory. Lin rejected its argument that Trump’s directive exceeded presidential authority and entered judgment for agencies that took no action.

    She vacated the designation and Hegseth’s boycott order, issued a permanent injunction, and denied the government’s request for a seven-day administrative stay. Lin pointed out that the government had been operating under a preliminary injunction since March without demonstrating any harm.

    Anthropic had informed the court that if these measures remained in place, its defense-related revenue would decrease by 50% to 100%, and its overall revenue for 2026 would be reduced by billions of dollars.

  • HMRC Data: Crypto Gains Heavily Concentrated Among Few, Younger Men Dominate

    HMRC Data: Crypto Gains Heavily Concentrated Among Few, Younger Men Dominate

    HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has released its inaugural official figures on cryptoasset capital gains, revealing that a small cohort of individuals accounts for a disproportionately large share of the gains. For the 2024-25 tax year, 240 individuals each declared over £1 million in cryptoasset capital gains, amassing a total of £717 million. This group, representing fewer than 2% of all crypto taxpayers, was responsible for more than half of the total reported crypto gains (£1.38 billion) and disposal proceeds (£13.8 billion).

    The data, gathered through a new dedicated section on the Self Assessment return for cryptoasset disposals, also highlights significant demographic trends. The 25-44 age group, comprising 54% of crypto taxpayers, accounted for 71% of all crypto disposal proceeds. This contrasts sharply with general capital gains taxpayers, where only 17% fall into this age bracket. Men were the dominant demographic among crypto taxpayers, making up 87% of those reporting gains and booking 93% of the total gains.

    Conversely, the majority of crypto taxpayers—65%—reported gains below £25,000. These smaller gains collectively represented just 7% of total crypto gains and 8% of disposal proceeds, underscoring the concentration of wealth within the UK’s cryptoasset market.

    In the broader financial landscape, total capital gains in Britain reached a record £127 billion in the 2024-25 tax year, generating £24.2 billion in tax. While significant for those involved, the tax contributions from cryptoassets remain a marginal component of the UK’s overall capital gains tax revenue.

    Looking ahead, the UK is set to enhance international tax transparency with the implementation of the OECD’s Cryptoasset Reporting Framework. This framework will mandate crypto service providers to share customer data with tax authorities, with HMRC beginning to receive this information in 2027. Non-compliant providers face penalties of up to £300 per user.

    James Murray, Financial Secretary to the Treasury, acknowledged HMRC’s efforts in providing guidance and outreach on cryptoasset obligations, which he stated resulted in an additional £168 million in Capital Gains. The specific period for this additional revenue was not detailed.

    Certainties remain limited regarding the precise tax revenue generated solely from cryptoassets, as these liabilities are not itemized separately from other assets taxed at main rates. Furthermore, the exact timeframe for the £168 million in additional Capital Gains attributed to HMRC’s outreach is not specified.

    For the 2025-26 tax year, gains exceeding the annual allowance must be reported by 31 January 2027. The Treasury also intends to defer capital gains tax on Decentralized Finance (DeFi) lending and liquidity pool deposits until such assets are genuinely disposed of.

    Why This Matters

    The materials describe a narrow update: HMRC’s first official figures on cryptoasset capital gains for the 2024-25 tax year show that 240 individuals declared over £1 million each in gains, totaling £717 million. The exact amount of tax revenue generated specifically from cryptoassets is not separated from other assets taxed at main rates.

    Broader Context

    Source materials place the factual news in this context: Taxes are due on cryptoasset gains just like any other gains.

  • Trump Crypto Firm Under Fire for Saudi Stake in New Bank

    Trump Crypto Firm Under Fire for Saudi Stake in New Bank

    World Liberty Financial Secures Preliminary Approval for National Trust Bank

    A cryptocurrency venture with ties to former President Donald Trump, World Liberty Financial, is moving forward with plans to establish a federally chartered national trust bank. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) granted preliminary conditional approval for the venture earlier this month.

    An entity reportedly linked to Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed al Nahyan and his co-investors holds a significant 49% stake in the holding company for World Liberty Financial, representing the largest ownership share within that structure.

    Sheikh Tahnoon and Co-Investors Own Majority Stake in Holding Company

    Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed al Nahyan, who also serves as the UAE’s national security adviser, along with co-investors, collectively own 49% of WLTC Holdings. This entity serves as the holding company for World Liberty Financial.

    The proposed bank is slated to handle the issuance, redemption, and safeguarding of USD1, a stablecoin backed by the U.S. dollar that World Liberty launched last year. This initiative aims to integrate World Liberty’s stablecoin operations with a federally chartered trust bank.

    OCC Approval is Preliminary and Conditional

    It is important to note that the OCC’s recent action is a preliminary and conditional approval, not a final banking charter. The approval pertains to World Liberty Financial’s proposal to establish a federally chartered national trust bank.

    The bank’s intended functions are to manage the issuance, redemption, and safeguarding of USD1. The conditional approval does not constitute a final charter.

    Significant Foreign Investment in Proposed Bank Structure

    According to individuals familiar with the matter who spoke to The Wall Street Journal, an entity connected to Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed al Nahyan and his co-investors possesses the largest stake, at 49%, in World Liberty’s banking holding company. The Journal had previously reported that Sheikh Tahnoon backed a $500 million investment in World Liberty Financial last year, in exchange for a 49% equity stake in the company.

    This reported holding company stake positions an entity associated with Sheikh Tahnoon and his co-investors within the ownership framework of the proposed bank.

    Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed al Nahyan is the national security adviser of the United Arab Emirates and the brother of the country’s president. He oversees a vast business empire estimated to be worth over $1.3 trillion, funded by both his personal wealth and state resources, according to The Journal.

    Expansion of Business Ties with Foreign Official

    This new venture signifies an expansion of the business relationship between the Trump-linked cryptocurrency company and a prominent foreign government official, as reported by The Journal. World Liberty Financial is pursuing the establishment of a proposed bank whose holding company ownership includes an entity linked to Sheikh Tahnoon and his co-investors.

    The OCC’s preliminary conditional approval, coupled with the reported ownership structure, are key components of this proposed venture. The bank’s planned role is directly tied to the issuance, redemption, and safeguarding of USD1.

    The approval remains in its preliminary and conditional phase. World Liberty Financial’s proposed bank has not yet received its final charter. For the time being, the bank’s stated purpose is to issue, redeem, and safeguard USD1.