Tag: Negative

Major financial institutions are reportedly exploring or advancing plans for stablecoin issuance and the development of new blockchain networks, a move that could significantly alter the competitive landscape for existing crypto-native issuers like Circle and Coinbase. These developments coincide with ongoing legislative efforts in the U.S., such as the CLARITY Act, which aims to establish a regulatory framework for digital assets.

Bank Initiatives and Market Reaction

Recent reports indicate that several prominent banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Santander, are investigating the possibility of issuing their own stablecoins. In a separate but related initiative, a consortium of over a dozen banks, operating under the name BankChain Alliance, is developing a new blockchain network. This network is intended to serve as a payment rail and is anticipated to support use cases such as stablecoins and tokenized deposits, with a projected launch in the first half of 2027.

The news has already had an observable impact on the market, with shares of Circle and Coinbase reportedly falling more than 3% in the past day. This market reaction suggests investor concern that stablecoins issued and distributed at scale by major banks could reduce the market share currently held by crypto-native issuers and their products, such as Circle’s USDC.

Details on Bank Plans and Alliances

While JPMorgan Chase has explored a potential stablecoin, the company has stated that no product is currently under development. However, a consortium of more than a dozen banks, including Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Santander, is reportedly advancing plans for a commercial-focused stablecoin. The BankChain Alliance has announced its intention to create an industry-owned and industry-governed blockchain network. According to the Wall Street Journal, the organizations involved in the BankChain Alliance, modeled on the Federal Home Loan Bank system, represent a significant portion of the U.S. banking sector, encompassing approximately 3,283 institutions and $21.8 trillion in assets. Planned use cases for the BankChain network include treasury management, supply-chain financing, cash management, tokenized deposits, stablecoins, smart payment tools, and automated settlement.

Legislative Context and Future Outlook

Coinbase has been a prominent advocate for the CLARITY Act, with its CEO Brian Armstrong and other executives actively urging the Senate to advance the bill. However, at the time of reporting, the CLARITY Act had not yet passed the Senate, and certain issues, such as its treatment of stablecoin yield, remained to be resolved. The progress of these bank initiatives and the legislative process are expected to remain central to discussions surrounding competition in the stablecoin market.

These developments highlight a potential shift in the digital asset space, with traditional financial institutions increasingly exploring blockchain technology and stablecoin issuance. While the BankChain Alliance network is anticipated for 2027, the exact timelines for other bank-specific stablecoin products remain uncertain. The BankChain Alliance is also reportedly seeking a technology partner for its network. The ongoing evolution of these initiatives, alongside legislative developments, will be closely watched by market participants.

Why This Matters

The materials describe a narrow update: Several major banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Santander, are reportedly exploring or advancing plans to issue their own stablecoins. JPMorgan Chase’s stablecoin discussions remain preliminary and no product is under development.

Broader Context

Source materials place the factual news in this context: The BankChain Alliance announced an industry-owned and industry-governed blockchain network intended to enable banks of all sizes to build modern payment rails.

Tokenized Deposits Could Undermine Bank Stability, Dallas Fed Warns

Tokenized deposits, while potentially enabling faster payments, could also destabilize bank funding, according to a new report from the Dallas Federal Reserve. The study, released Tuesday, explores the implications of widespread adoption of this technology on bank liquidity and the practice of maturity transformation—where banks use demandable deposits to fund longer-term loans.

The report highlights that advancements in distributed ledger technology, most notably blockchain, have paved the way for digital payment infrastructure and real-time settlement. While stablecoins have attracted significant attention and regulatory scrutiny both domestically and internationally, tokenized deposits have received comparatively less focus.

Unlike stablecoins such as USDT and USDC, tokenized deposits are regulated and can offer interest payments. However, the Dallas Fed report cautions that features like instant settlement, smart contracts, and agentic artificial intelligence could empower customers to more easily seek higher yields, thereby diminishing the “stickiness” of current deposits.

“Sticky deposits rely in part on the existence of frictions preventing rapid reallocation from one bank to another,” the agency stated. “Instant settlement would allow deposit holders who prioritize yield to switch banks almost instantaneously.”

The prospect of faster deposit outflows and increased sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations could lead banks to become more hesitant in holding longer-term, fixed-rate assets. The Dallas Fed estimates that a 10% increase in deposit-rate sensitivity could reduce banks’ capacity to manage interest-rate risk by approximately $700 billion in 10-year-equivalent terms.

Furthermore, the authors calculated separately that a 10% reduction in the weighted average life of deposits could diminish the banking system’s maturity-transformation capacity by $580 billion.

“Alternatively, banks could strive to leave the composition of lending close to unchanged by altering their liabilities in other ways,” the report suggests. “This would likely include greater reliance on term debt issuance; on the margin, the economics of such lending activity funded by wholesale debt would resemble those of non-bank financial firms and would thus likely adversely impact the cost of credit for consumers and businesses.”

This report emerges amid a growing wave of tokenized payment experiments by financial institutions. In October 2025, Custodia and Vantage launched a U.S. tokenized-deposit network. Barclays was reportedly exploring tokenized deposits and stablecoin payments as of February 2026, and BMO announced plans in March for round-the-clock tokenized cash settlement in collaboration with CME Group and Google Cloud.

More recently, in July, the global payment system Swift revealed a pilot program involving 17 international banks to facilitate the transfer of tokenized deposits outside of standard banking hours. However, final settlement in this pilot would still be contingent on legacy payment systems operating during business hours.

A Las Vegas businessman, Brent C. Kovar, has been convicted by a federal jury for defrauding over 400 investors of approximately $24 million through a cryptocurrency investment scheme operated by his company, Profit Connect. The scheme ran from late 2017 through July 2021.

According to the US Justice Department, Kovar misled investors with false claims about Profit Connect’s operations and financial health. He allegedly promised fixed annual returns of 15% to 30%, a 100% money-back may provide, and asserted that the company was backed by hundreds of millions of dollars in cryptocurrency reserves. Furthermore, Kovar falsely claimed that investments were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

Prosecutors demonstrated that Kovar was aware of these misrepresentations. Evidence revealed that Profit Connect was not profitable, lacked the purported crypto reserves, and was unable to fulfill the promised returns or may provide them. Instead, Kovar allegedly diverted investor funds for personal expenses, employee gifts, and the purchase of a house. He also reportedly used funds from new investors to repay earlier ones, creating a deceptive appearance of profitability and legitimacy.

Kovar was found guilty on 11 counts of wire fraud, two counts of mail fraud, and two counts of money laundering. “The victims in this case thought they were engaged in revolutionary technological advancement, but it was merely a deception crafted by the falsehoods and trickery of Mr. Kovar,” stated Special Agent in Charge Christopher S. Delzotto of the FBI Las Vegas Field Office. Special Agent in Charge Ryan Korner with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Office of Inspector General reported that Kovar’s claim of FDIC insurance was also false.

Kovar is scheduled for sentencing on November 30, 2026, and faces a potential maximum penalty of 280 years in prison.

In a separate case, Japheth Dillman was convicted of wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud for defrauding more than 20 investors of nearly $1 million through a cryptocurrency trading fund, Block Bits Capital. This scheme operated from June 2017 to August 2018.

Dillman and a co-conspirator allegedly told investors that their fund used an automated trading software called “Autotrader” to generate profits. However, evidence presented at trial indicated that Dillman knew the trading algorithm was not functioning as claimed. Investor funds were reportedly used for personal payments and invested in other high-risk cryptocurrency ventures that suffered significant losses, rather than for the promised trading activities.

Dillman, 48, remains released on bond and is scheduled for sentencing on December 8, 2026. He faces up to 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine for each count.

These convictions underscore a pattern of deceptive practices within the cryptocurrency investment sector, where misrepresentations regarding profitability, technology, and security are common tactics used to defraud investors. Regulatory bodies continue to pursue enforcement actions against such fraudulent schemes.

Broader Context

Source materials place the factual news in this context: The article discusses two separate but similar cryptocurrency investment fraud cases.

Why This Matters

These convictions highlight the persistent risks and deceptive practices within the cryptocurrency investment space. They serve as a cautionary tale for potential investors, demonstrating the significant financial losses that can result from fraudulent schemes and underscoring the ongoing enforcement actions by regulatory bodies against such activities.

Jury Convicts Las Vegas Businessman in $24 Million Cryptocurrency Ponzi Scheme

A federal jury in Las Vegas has found a local business owner guilty of orchestrating a $24 million cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme that defrauded at least 400 investors, the Department of Justice announced Monday.

Brent C. Kovar, the owner of Profit Connect, a Las Vegas-based company, operated the scheme from late 2017 until July 2021. He falsely claimed the company utilized artificial intelligence software on a supercomputer to mine cryptocurrency and verify transactions on other networks. Investors were enticed with promises of fixed annual returns ranging from 15% to 30%, a full money-back guarantee, and assurances that the company was backed by hundreds of millions of dollars in crypto reserves.

Prosecutors presented evidence that Kovar was aware Profit Connect was not profitable, possessed no actual reserves, and was incapable of delivering the advertised returns or honoring its guarantees. Funds from new investors were allegedly used to sustain company operations, purchase employee gifts, and acquire a house for Kovar. A portion of this money was also recirculated to earlier investors, misrepresented as mining profits.

Adding to the deception, Kovar reportedly informed investors that their funds were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). This claim was investigated by the FDIC’s Office of Inspector General, in conjunction with the FBI and IRS Criminal Investigation.

Following a nine-day trial, Kovar was convicted on 11 counts of wire fraud, two counts of mail fraud, and two counts of money laundering. He is scheduled for sentencing on November 30 and faces a potential maximum sentence of 280 years, though the final term will be determined by the judge based on federal sentencing guidelines.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) had previously intervened, shutting down Profit Connect five years ago. In July 2021, the SEC obtained a restraining order and asset freeze, initially estimating investor losses at up to $12 million from at least 277 investors. This figure is now understood to be half of the total losses established by prosecutors. The SEC noted that over 90% of the company’s income originated from investors, and none of these funds were used for actual cryptocurrency trading.

Kovar reportedly ran the business with his mother, Joy, who was 86 at the time. The SEC indicated that $1.2 million was transferred into her personal account in ten equal installments over less than two months, with an additional $1.7 million withdrawn through cash, credit card payments, and the purchase of a vehicle. The Justice Department’s announcement on Monday specifically named Brent Kovar in relation to the criminal convictions.

This is not Kovar’s first encounter with regulatory action. The SEC had previously filed a civil injunction against him and his father, Glenn, in 2009 for their involvement in a “pump-and-dump” scheme operated through a company called Skyway Global, which also resulted in $12 million in investor losses.

Investment fraud continues to be the most significant category of cryptocurrency-related crime reported to the FBI. In 2025, the bureau logged $11.37 billion in losses, a 22% increase from the previous year. The Consumer Federation of America, using a multiplier to account for unreported fraud, estimated total losses to be $80.7 billion, with individuals over 60 accounting for $4.4 billion of the reported figures.

HMRC Intensifies Crypto Tax Scrutiny, Sends Over 81,000 Warning Letters

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has significantly ramped up its oversight of UK cryptocurrency users in the 2025-2026 financial year, reportedly dispatching more than 81,000 warning letters to individuals suspected of having unpaid tax liabilities. This figure, revealed by the BBC following a review of a freedom of information request, represents a nearly threefold increase from the 27,714 letters issued in 2024.

HMRC believes a substantial portion of the undeclared tax stems from gains realized during the cryptocurrency bull market that spanned from 2022 to 2025. The tax authority has reminded recipients that tax obligations can be triggered by various actions, including selling, gifting, exchanging, or using cryptocurrency for purchases.

Failure to comply with tax regulations can lead to penalties equivalent to up to 100% of the owed tax, in addition to accrued interest. Offshore transfers, in particular, may carry more severe repercussions.

This intensified crackdown is poised to broaden further with HMRC set to acquire new powers in 2027. Under these forthcoming regulations, offshore firms will be mandated to provide customer information to the UK tax authority. HMRC estimates this measure could generate an additional £315 million (approximately $430 million) by 2030.

Neela Chauhan, a partner at accounting firm UHY Hacker Young, commented to the BBC that many cryptocurrency traders are young and lack prior experience navigating HMRC procedures. She noted that some operate under the misconception that the agency has limited insight into their digital asset activities. Chauhan also suggested that authorities suspect many investors of tax evasion and anticipates that identifying unpaid liabilities among wealthier holders will become considerably easier once the new powers are enacted.

Banking Access Emerges as a Major Industry Concern

While HMRC tightens its regulatory grip, access to banking services is becoming a significant challenge for the cryptocurrency industry. Earlier this month, Parliament’s Crypto and Digital Assets All-Party Parliamentary Group formally requested explanations from the chief executives of major UK banks regarding their dealings with cryptocurrency businesses. Labour MP Gurinder Singh Josan and Lord Vaizey of Didcot initiated this inquiry following persistent complaints from firms struggling to open bank accounts and reports of payment restrictions.

The parliamentary group has questioned banks on their policies, transaction limits, the rationale behind these decisions, and whether the UK’s upcoming cryptocurrency regulations might influence their approach. While acknowledging the necessity for banks to combat financial crime and protect customers, the MPs emphasized that firms should be assessed based on their individual risk profiles rather than being broadly categorized by their sector. Lord Vaizey described the banking access issues as “an unnecessary piece of friction.”

Research conducted by the UK Cryptoasset Business Council indicates that banks are currently blocking or delaying approximately 40% of attempted transfers to digital asset exchanges.