CLARITY Act Momentum Wanes as Approval Odds Drop

Senate Crypto Bill Faces Uncertain July 4 Deadline

A target date of July 4 for advancing cryptocurrency market-structure legislation through the Senate is now looking less certain, according to Galaxy Digital’s head of research.

Senate Calendar Creates a Bottleneck

Alex Thorn has revised his probability estimate for the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 from 75% down to 60%, citing a Senate schedule that has become increasingly crowded with competing priorities.

Next week’s agenda is expected to be dominated by Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)-related business following a failed reauthorization vote, leaving little room for crypto legislation to progress. Thorn stated that the obstacle is no longer political will, as support for the bill has not waned. The issue, he explained, is time.

“I just sent this note to clients lowering my odds of 2026 clarity act passage from 75% immediately post-markup to 60% today,” Thorn tweeted on June 5, 2026. “I said in May that the Senate calendar was one of the biggest hurdles, and that picture has worsened. Last night the FISA reauth vote failed, so now next…”

Unresolved Issues Add to the Delay

Two sticking points remain on the table: lawmaker ethics rules and illicit finance provisions tied to the bill. Neither has been resolved, and the lack of movement on both fronts has further complicated the path forward.

Despite the lowered odds, Thorn expressed optimism about the bill’s eventual passage, though he cautioned that the timeline is now more fluid than many had assumed.

The CLARITY Act is widely considered the most consequential crypto legislation currently before Congress. Its central aim is to resolve a long-standing dispute between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) over regulatory jurisdiction in the digital asset space. Under the proposal, tokens classified as commodities would fall under CFTC oversight, while those deemed securities would remain under the SEC’s purview. This distinction would reshape how exchanges operate and the compliance requirements for crypto projects. Supporters argue that federal clarity on these boundaries would reduce regulatory uncertainty and prevent crypto development from migrating overseas.

A Window That May Be Closing

Senator Cynthia Lummis had previously indicated July 4 as a potential marker for advancing market-structure legislation in the Senate. Thorn’s revised figure puts pressure on that informal target. His assessment reflects scheduling constraints rather than a shift in lawmakers’ views on the bill itself. For crypto stakeholders awaiting regulatory certainty, the revised outlook suggests a potentially longer path toward comprehensive legislation.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *