Robinhood has publicly rejected AMC Entertainment’s demand to cease trading stock tokens that track AMC’s stock, escalating a dispute over securities laws and the nature of tokenized assets. Robinhood’s chief legal officer, Dan Gallagher, responded directly to AMC CEO Adam Aron’s public demand, stating, “Send your lawyers and we’ll educate them.” Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev affirmed this stance, adding, “We stand behind Stock Tokens.”
Adam Aron had accused Robinhood of marketing unregistered securities and undermining shareholder rights, demanding that Robinhood “voluntarily CEASE AND DECIST the trading of AMC stock tokens.” Aron also indicated that AMC’s legal counsel would explore options to force Robinhood to stop trading the tokens and that the company would raise its concerns with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Robinhood’s disclosures describe the tokens as debt securities issued by Robinhood Assets (Jersey) Limited. According to these disclosures, the tokens are not registered under U.S. securities laws and cannot be offered or sold within the United States or to U.S. persons. AMC’s core contention is that the tokens are being marketed in a way that misrepresents them as AMC stock and bypasses U.S. securities regulations.
Legal experts suggest that AMC’s potential legal angles could involve claims of trademark misuse or a false association with AMC. However, they also note that Robinhood could counter these claims by clearly identifying the products as tracking tokens without AMC’s endorsement and limiting the use of AMC’s branding, potentially arguing for fair use. According to Miami crypto lawyer Russell Klein, if Robinhood provides clear disclaimers that the tokens are derivatives and not company shares, AMC may have limited recourse beyond legal threats and lobbying regulators. Klein also suggested that trademark law can permit the use of a company’s logo to identify it, and that traders are unlikely to believe they possess shareholder rights through these tokens.
Daniel Lasko, general counsel at Arcus, questioned AMC’s ability to prevent such products, comparing the arrangement to an investment manager including a company’s stock in an ETF. Lasko argued that publicly traded companies have limited control over how their stocks are packaged into financial products and that tokenized stocks could potentially attract international investors, thereby promoting investment in U.S. capital markets.
Tokenized stocks are blockchain-based assets designed to track or represent shares in publicly traded companies. This market segment saw significant activity, generating $15.1 billion in spot trading volume in the first quarter of 2026, according to CoinGecko. Robinhood first introduced tokenized stock trading for its European customers last summer. This move follows a previous instance where OpenAI objected to tokens bearing its name in July of the previous year, citing a lack of partnership or approval from Robinhood.
The dispute between AMC and Robinhood highlights potential ambiguities in existing securities and trademark laws concerning novel blockchain-based financial products. The situation could also lead to increased regulatory scrutiny of such products by the SEC, as AMC has stated its intention to raise concerns with the commission. The ultimate legal outcome and the future regulatory treatment of tokenized stocks remain uncertain.
Why This Matters
The materials describe a narrow update: Robinhood, through its chief legal officer Dan Gallagher, publicly rejected AMC Entertainment’s demand to stop trading stock tokens that track AMC’s stock. Whether AMC will file a lawsuit against Robinhood.
Broader Context
Source materials place the factual news in this context: Robinhood has rejected AMC Entertainment’s demand to stop trading tokens tied to its stock, with the brokerage’s top lawyer challenging the theater chain to pursue its legal threats.









